A human in the market relations system

Authors: Troitskaya I.A.
Published in issue: #7(12)/2017
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2017-7-133
Category: Humanities | Chapter: Philosophy Science
Keywords: human behavior, economic relations, the Adam Smith model, marxism, keynesianism, the western model
Published: 28.06.2017

The article is devoted to the topical issue — the place of a human in the modern market relations system. We pay our attention to the interconnection of various market relations and consider the theoretical basis on this issue. Moreover, we singled out the characteristic features of the approaches used earlier to assess the role of a human in the system of economics, and identified the model used at present.

References

[1] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. The path to the mentality category in the history of social cognition. Gumanitarnyy vestnik [Humanities Bulletin], 2016, no. 8 (46). Available at: http://hmbul.ru/catalog/hum/phil/383.html.

[2] Gubanov N.N. Epistemological status of the mental category. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy], 2009, no. 2, pp. 71–84.

[3] Gubanov N.N. Mentality role in society developing. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Humanitates [Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates], 2007, no. 1, pp. 99–105.

[4] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Functioning of mentality in society: socio-cultural hypothesis. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya i tekhnologii [Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology], 2016, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 13–20.

[5] Chaplygina I. G. “Economic man” of J.S. Mill and A. Smith: methodological aspects of the conceptions. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta, 2015, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 15–27. Available at: https://archive.econ.msu.ru/sys/raw.php?o=3642&p=attachment.

[6] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Socio-cultural hypothesis of mentality functioning in a society. Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and Power], 2016, no. 5(61), pp. 20–24.

[7] Bushueva V.V., Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Laws of the triple determination of scientific creativity. Gumanitarnyy vestnik [Humanities Bulletin], 2016, no. 5(43). URL: http://hmbul.ru/catalog/hum/phil/362.html.

[8] Kanke V.A. Filosofiya ekonomicheskoy nauki [Economic science philosophy]. Moscow, INFRA-M publ., 2009. 384 p.

[9] Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. T. 22 [Writings. Vol. 22]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury publ., 1990. 805 p.

[10] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Lebedev S.A. Lectures on the philosophy of science: a tutorial. M.: Publisher MSTU named after N.E. Bauman, 2014. 318 p. Grif UMO universities in university polytechnic education. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii, 2014, no. 2(2), pp. 95–100.

[11] Ryabokon’ N.V., ed. Filosofiya [Philosophy]. Minsk, MIU publ., 2009. 288 p.

[12] Hobbes T. Leviafan, ili materiya, forma i vlast’ gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan or the matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiasticall and civil]. Available at: http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/GOBBS/leviafan.txt (accessed 15 April 2017).

[13] Zapadnaya model’ bol’she ne rabotaet [West model is no more working]. Available at: http://gefter.ru/archive/14255 (accessed 15 April 2017).