|

Execution of an order as a circumstance precluding criminality of an act

Authors: Panchenko A.N., Sukhno V.A.
Published in issue: #4(69)/2022
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2022-4-782


Category: Jurisprudence | Chapter: Criminal Law and Criminology

Keywords: order, execution of order, criminal code, criminal order, criminal liability, legitimate infliction of harm upon execution of order, circumstances excluding criminality of act, execution of directives
Published: 21.04.2022

The legal analysis of the criminal law norms concerning one of the circumstances which exclude criminality of an act, such as execution of an order, has been carried out. The relevance of the topic in contemporary society is connected, on the one hand, with a high degree of resonance of the officials issuing an order and, on the other hand, with the subordinates who are obliged to obey it but who are naturally concerned about their own safety and anxious to understand the risks of criminal prosecution in case of execution of an order contrary to the law in force. The legal nature of an order, the conditions of its compulsory execution and possible nuances, resulting from the legal norms in the process of its practical realization have been investigated.


References

[1] Amelina K.E., Kovaleva M.A., Tikhanova N.E. Pravovedenie [Legal science]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2019 (in Russ.).

[2] Ugolovnyy kodeks RF. Federal’nyy zakon ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (poslednyaya redaktsiya). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii (SZRF), 17.06.1996. N 25 (1 ch.). St. 2954. [The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Federal law of 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (last revision). Russian Federation Code, 17.06.1996. N 25 (1 part). Art. 2954] (in Russ.).

[3] Ignatov A.N., Krasikov Yu.A. Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. T. 1. Obshchaya chast’ [Course on Russian criminal law. Vol. 1. General information]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2001 (in Russ.).

[4] Rarog A.I., ed. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Commentaries to the Criminal law of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2017 (in Russ.).

[5] Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 23 maya 2018 goda po delu № 22-1277/2018 [Appellate resolution of Orenburg regional court of 23 May 2018 on case no. 22-1277/2018]. sudact.ru: website (in Russ.). URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/wBJI8i5HBMr3/ (accessed: 25.02.2021).

[6] Prigovor Kirovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 29 aprelya 2019 goda po delu № 22-822/2019 [Kirov regional court decree of 29 April 2019 on case no. 22-822/2019]. sudact.ru: website (in Russ.). URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/DvzHDyKKkgLq/ (accessed: 23.02.2021).

[7] Zhenevskaya konventsiya ot 12 avgusta 1949 goda o zashchite grazhdanskogo naseleniya vo vremya voyny [Geneva convention of 12 August 1949 relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war]. un.org: website (in Russ.). URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/geneva_civilian.shtml (accessed: 24.02.2021).

[8] O politsii. Federal’nyy zakon ot 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (poslednyaya redaktsiya) [On police. Federal law of 07.02.2011 N 3-FZ (last revision)] (in Russ.).

[9] Bastrykin A.I., ed. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal law]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2017 (in Russ.).

[10] Kapinus O.S., ed. Aktual’nye problemy ugolovnogo prava [Actual problems of criminal law]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016 (in Russ.).

[11] Tikhanova N.E. Conditions legitimacy of necessary defense from actions dangerous to life. Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [News of the Tula state university. Economic and legal sciences], 2016, no. 2-2, pp. 199–203 (in Russ.).

[12] Tikhanova N.E. Problems of use of weapons in the defense. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Pravo], 2018, no. 1, pp. 186–190 (in Russ.).