Social risks of information technology development in the knowledge society
| Authors: Sorokin M.A. | |
| Published in issue: #5(100)/2025 | |
| DOI: | |
Category: Humanities | Chapter: Social sciences |
|
Keywords: information technologies, digitalization, knowledge society, social risks, digital inequality, information security, soft security, ethical and legal risks |
|
| Published: 17.10.2025 | |
The article examines the social risks of information technology development in the context of globalization and the transition to a knowledge society in which these technologies are a key factor in development. It is shown that the rapid process of digitalization and the deep penetration of information and communication technologies into all spheres of modern society are accompanied by significant social challenges and risks that require close attention from researchers, politicians and the public. The risks of digital inequality, prospects and dangers of loss of privacy, threats to information and soft security are analyzed, taking into account global trends, unresolved ethical issues and lack of legal regulation.
References
[1] Towards Knowledge Societies: UNESCO World Report. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141843 (accessed 11.03.2025).
[2] Castells M. The Information Age: economics, society and Culture. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2000. (In Russ.).
[3] Lysak I.V. New educational technologies as a means of overcoming the digital divide. Modern High-tech Technologies, 2017, No. 7, pp. 129-135. (In Russ.). URL: https://top-technologies.ru/ru/article/view?id=36743 (accessed 17.03.2025)
[4] OECD. Understanding the digital divide. OECD Documents on the Digital Economy, No. 49. OECD Publishing House, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/236405667766
[5] The era of digital interdependence. Report of the Secretary-General on digital cooperation. New York, United Nations, 2019, 56 p. URL: https://www.un.org/en/content/digital-cooperation-roadmap/assets/pdf/Roadmap_for_Digital_Cooperation_EN.pdf (accessed 17.03.2025).
[6] Uskov V.S. Development of the digital economy of Russia: factors and regional differences. Problems of territorial development, 2024, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 28-41. (In Russ.).
[7] Dolgikh E.A., Parshintseva L.S. Assessment of innovative development of Russian regions. Finance and Management, 2024, No. 3, pp. 37-56. (In Russ.).
[8] Vlasyuk L.I. Digital inequality in Russian regions: strategic Opportunities and Threats. Encyclopedia of Achievements, 2023, volume 16 (1), pp. 59-68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-1-59-68
[9] Dobrinskaya D.E., Martynenko T.S. Prospects of the Russian information society: levels of the digital divide. Bulletin of the RUDN University. Ser. Philosophy, 2019, No. 1, pp. 108-120. (In Russ.).
[10] International Telecommunication Union. Information Society Assessment Report for 2007. The ICT Capability Index and global telecommunication/ICT technology indicators. Geneva, ITU Publ.
[11] Chesnokova L.V. Transformation of information privacy in modern digital society. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture, 2024, No. 5. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2024.5.17
[12] Rakova V.A., Dozhdikova R.N. Information manipulation: distorted perception and dissemination of negative information. Philosophy of peace and creation. National unity and historical memory. Mater. International round tables. Minsk, BNTU Publ., 2023, pp. 118-121. (In Russ.). URL: https://rep.bntu.by/handle/data/131125 (accessed 19.03.2025).
[13] Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Personal traits and attributes are predictable based on digital recordings of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, volume 110 (15), pp. 5802-5805. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
[14] Cadwalladr S. Cambridge Analytica files. keeper. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/news/series/cambridge-analytica-files (accessed 19.03.2025).
[15] Hikikomori F., Zuboff S. The Era of supervisory capitalism: the struggle for the future of humanity at the new frontiers of power. New York, Public Relations Publ., 2019, 704 p.
[16] Vorochkov A.P. “Soft power” of modern Russia: the institutional aspect. Theories and Problems of Political Research, 2016, vol. 5, No. 5A, pp. 258-275. (In Russ.).
[17] Burnasheva M.P., Malenko S.A., Nekita A.G. The Internet meme as a tool of manipulation in the modern cultural and information space. The composition of the editorial board and the organizing committee. The best research paper. IV International Scientific Research competition: collection of tr. Petrozavodsk, New Science (IP Ivanovskaya I.I.) Publ., 2024, pp. 73-82. (In Russ.).
[18] Balakhonskiy V.V., Strelchenko V.I., Balakhonskaya L.V. Epistemological tools of modern practices of falsification of history. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Man, 2024, vol. 13, pp. 31-37. (In Russ.).
[19] Strategy for the development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017-2030. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41919 (accessed 11.03.2025).
[20] Manzhueva O.M. Norbert Wieners Information Ethics. Bulletin of BSU, 2013, No. 6, pp. 53-57. (In Russ.).
[21] Toussaint N. Access allowed: free Facebook basics in Africa. Mass Media, Culture and Society, 2020, volume 42, pp. 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719890530
