Main Catalog Jurisprudence Criminal Law and Criminology

Forensic computer technical examination in the system of forensic examination

Authors: Bayush A.A.
Published in issue: #8(37)/2019
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2019-8-514
Category: Jurisprudence \| Chapter: Criminal Law and Criminology
Keywords: forensic examination, forensic expert, expert opinion, forensic computer-technical examination (FCTE), objects of FCTE, special knowledge, identification tasks, diagnostic tasks
Published: 02.09.2019

This article considers one of the most promising areas of forensic examination — forensic computer-technical examination (FCTE), appointed by authorized bodies and officials. The definition is given of FCTE as a separate kind of engineering and technical class of examinations and subject and FCTE, the main branches of special knowledge used by experts in this field in the process of FCTE are listed. Also, the classification of research objects of FCTE is given, both the main types of FCTE and the objectives of the study of the latter are analyzed. Examples of specific identification and diagnostic tasks of FCTE are given, the main promising areas of FCTE are identified.

References

[1] Moiseeva T.F., ed. Komp’yuternye tekhnologii v sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel’nosti [Computer technologies in forensic activity]. Moscow, RGUP Publ., 2016 (in Russ.).

[2] Bezlepkin B.T., ed. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) s uchetom FZ № 271-FZ, 272-FZ, 302-FZ [Comments to the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure (clause by clause) taking into account FL no. 271-FZ, 272-FZ, 302-FZ]. Moscow, Prospekt Pybl., 2016 (in Russ.).

[3] Eysman A.A., ed. Zaklyuchenie eksperta (struktura i nauchnoe obosnovanie) [Expert report (structure and scientific rationale]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 1967 (in Russ.).

[4] Charykov A.V., Charykov V.I. Electrotechnical expertise, special knowledge: the discussion on the given topic. Vestnik KrasGAU [The Bulletin of KrasGAU], 2014, no. 5, pp. 278–281 (in Russ.).

[5] Usov A.I., ed. Proizvodstvo sudebnoy komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoy ekspertizy. Ch. V. Aktual’nye zadachi issledovaniya komp’yuternoy informatsii [Proceeding of computer forensic examination. P. V Actual problems of computer information study]. Moscow, RFTsSE pri Minyuste RF Publ., 2011 (in Russ.).

[6] Galinskaya A.E. The use of special knowledge by the parties and their representatives in cyber crime investigations. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy [Theory and Practice of Forensic Science], 2017, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–37. DOI: 10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-1-30-37 URL: https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/25 (in Russ.).

[7] Bayush A.A. [Forensic application of mathematical methods in cryptography and cryptoanalysis]. IX Mezhd. stud. nauch. konf. “Studencheskiy nauchnyy forum 2017” [IX Int. Student sci. conf. “Student scientific forum 2017”]. URL: https://scienceforum.ru/2017/article/2017040486 (accessed: 22.01.2018). (in Russ.).

[8] Rossinskaya E.R., ed. Ekspertiza v sudoproizvodstve [Expert evaluation in legal process]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016 (in Russ.).

[9] Federal’nyy zakon ot 27.07.2006 № 149-FZ “Ob informatsii, informatsionnykh tekhnologiyakh i o zashchite informatsii” [Federal law of 27.07.2006 no. 149-FZ “On information, information technologies and information protection”]. Parlamentskaya gazeta, 03.08.2006, no. 126-127 (in Russ.).

[10] Ugolovnyy kodeks RF ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2017) [The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 13.06.1996 no. 63-FZ (ed. of 29.07.2017)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 17.06.1996, no. 25, art. 2954 (in Russ.).

[11] Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse [Forensic enquiry in civil, arbitral, administrative and criminal process]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2011 (in Russ.).

[12] Federal’nyy zakon ot 31.05.2001 № 73-FZ “O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel’nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) [Federal law of 31.05.2001 no. 73-FZ “On federal forensic activity in Russian Federation” (as amended)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF, 04.06.2001, no. 23, art. 2291 (in Russ.).

[13] Bayush A.A. [Conception, contents and meaning of forensic enquiry in conditions of nowdays clerical work]. Studencheskaya nauchnaya vesna, posvyashchennaya 165-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.G. Shukhova. Sb. tez. dokl. vseros. stud. konf. [Students science spring dedicated to 165 anniversary of Shukhov V.G. Coll. Abs. Russ. Stud. Conf.]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2018, pp. 181–182 (in Russ.).

[14] Usov A.I., ed. Proizvodstvo sudebnoy komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoy ekspertizy. Ch. I. Obshchaya chast’ II. Diagnosticheskie i identifikatsionnye issledovaniya apparatnykh sredstv [Proceeding of computer forensic examination. P. I. Main part II. Diagnostic and identity hardware study]. Moscow, RFTsSE pri Minyuste RF Publ., 2009 (in Russ.).

[15] Rossinskaya E.R., ed. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v tsivilisticheskikh protsessakh [Forensic enquiry in civilized process]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018 (in Russ.).

[16] Zubakha V.S., Usov A.I., Saenko G.V., et al. Obshchie polozheniya po naznacheniyu i proizvodstvu komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoy ekspertizy [General conditions of assignment and production of computer forensics]. Moscow, GU EKTs MVD Rossii Publ., 2001 (in Russ.).

[17] Usov A.I. Metody i sredstva resheniya zadach komp’yuterno-tekhnicheskoy ekspertizy [Methods and tools for solving tasks of computer forensics]. Moscow, GU EKTs MVD Rossii Publ., 2002 (in Russ.).

[18] Khatuntsev N.A. Current trends in forensic information technology. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy [Theory and Practice of Forensic Science], 2018, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 121–124. DOI: 10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-1-121-124 URL: https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/398 (in Russ.).