Probability and reliability in an expert study
Authors: Kiryukhina D.A. | |
Published in issue: #2(79)/2023 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2023-2-866 | |
Category: Jurisprudence | Chapter: Criminal Law and Criminology |
|
Keywords: reliability, evidence, category, criterion, expert, expert research, forensic examination, probability, accounting |
|
Published: 16.03.2023 |
In the process of disclosure, investigation, prevention of deeds that violate the norm of law, may require the participation of a special subject who has special knowledge and conducts research — an expert. His conclusion, rendered on the results of research, should contain objective judgments and conclusions. The components of this document — probability and credibility. These concepts are important for the further course of disclosure, investigation of illegal acts from which depends the fate of people involved in them. In the presented article the definitions of the considered notions and factors which influence their formation are analyzed.
References
[1] Grigoryev I.A. Dostovernost kak pravovoy printsip sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti. Diss. kand. yur. nauk [Credibility as a legal principle of forensic activities. Kand. jur. sci. diss.]. Moscow, RFTsSE Publ., 2020 (in Russ.).
[2] Ilin N.N., ed. Sudebnye ekspertizy v ugolovnom protsesse [Forensic examinations in criminal proceedings]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2022 (in Russ.).
[3] Bobovkin M.V., Protkin. A.A., eds. Kriminalistika. Issledovanie dokumentov [Criminalistics. Examination of documents]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2022 (in Russ.).
[4] Rossinskaya E.R., ed. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse [Forensic examination in civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings]. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2018 (in Russ.).
[5] Skorokotyagin I.N., Skorokotyagina D.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza [Forensic expertise]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2022 (in Russ.).
[6] Rossinskaya E.R., ed. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Tipichnye oshibki [Forensic expertise. Typical errors]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2012 (in Russ.).
[7] Gradusova O.B., Kuzmin S.A. Probability interpretation of forensic evidence. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy [Theory and Practice of Forensic Science], 2017, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 27–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-4-6-11 (in Russ.).
[8] Bebeshko G.I., Voytov S.A., Omelyanyuk G.G. et al. Applying Bayesian methods for metrological evaluation and interpretation of forensic evidence. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy [Theory and Practice of Forensic Science], 2014, vol. 1, no. 33, pp. 148–158 (in Russ.).