Overview of the use of acoustic brainstem evoked potentials in modern clinical practice
Authors: Gress V.V. | |
Published in issue: #7(36)/2019 | |
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2019-7-497 | |
Category: Medical sciences | Chapter: Medical equipment and devices |
|
Keywords: acoustic brainstem evoked potentials (ABEP), multiple sclerosis, neonatal audiometry, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostics, clinical practice |
|
Published: 29.07.2019 |
The method of acoustic brainstem evoked potentials (ABEP) is used in clinical practice for the functional assessment of the auditory pathways of the brainstem. This article reviews literature concerning the biomedical application of ABEP and systemizes the results of these studies. Particular attention is paid to the use of ABEP in multiple sclerosis and in neonatal audiometry. The article describes basic principles of the ABEP registration method and provides regulatory data parameters of ABEP. On the basis of publications found in the Pubmed system, the main directions for using the method were identified and conclusions were drawn on the use of ABEP in modern clinical practice.
References
[1] Gnezditskiy V.V. Vyzvannye potentsialy mozga v klinicheskoy praktike [Brain evoked potential in clinical practice]. Taganrog, Izd-vo TRTU Publ., 1997 (in Russ.).
[2] Zenkov L.R., Ronkin M.A. Funktsional’naya diagnostika nervnykh bolezney [Functional dyagnostics of nervous diseases]. Moscow, MedPress-inform Publ., 2013 (in Russ.).
[3] Celesia G.G. Brainstem auditory evoked responses. In: Disorders of peripheral and central auditory processing. Elsevier, 2013, pp. 137–153.
[4] Jewett D.L., Romano M.N., Williston J.S. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science, 1970, vol. 167, no. 3924, pp. 1517–1518. DOI: 10.1126/science.167.3924.1517 URL: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/167/3924/1517
[5] Guideline 9C: Guidelines on short-latency auditory evoked potentials. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, 2008.
[6] Tafti M. Study and visualization of neurological signals on auditory evoked conditions. sg.inflibnet.ac.in: website. URL: https://sg.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/74099 (accessed: 05.05.2019).
[7] Hu H., Dietz M. Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants. Trend Hear., 2015, vol. 19, pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/2331216515617143 URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2331216515617143
[8] Chiappa K.H. Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory, and short–latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 1980, vol. 30, no. 7-2, pp. 110–123. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.30.7_part_2.110 URL: https://n.neurology.org/content/30/7_Part_2/110
[9] La Mantia L., Milanese C., Corridori F., et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ital. J. Neurol. Sci., 1982, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 289–293. DOI: 10.1007/BF02043576 URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02043576
[10] Trojaborg W., Bottcher J., Saxtrup O. Evoked potentials and immunoglobulin abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 1981, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 866–871. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.31.7.866 URL: https://n.neurology.org/content/31/7/866
[11] Sand T., Sjaastad O., Romslo I., et al. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the relation to VEP, SEP and CSF immunoglobulins. J. Neurol., 1990, vol. 237, no. 6, pp. 376–378. DOI: 10.1007/BF00315663 URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00315663
[12] Pelayo R., Montalban X., Minoves T., et al. Do multimodal evoked potentials add information to MRI in clinically isolated syndromes? Mult. Scler., 2010, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–61. DOI: 10.1177/1352458509352666 URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1352458509352666
[13] Calugaru L., Calugaru G.T., Calugaru O.M. Evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis diagnosis and management. Curr. Health. Sci. J., 2016, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 385–389. DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.42.04.08 URL: https://www.chsjournal.org/article/42/4/8/
[14] London F., El Sankari S., van Pesch V. Early disturbances in multimodal evoked potentials as a prognostic factor for long–term disability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2017, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 561–569. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.029 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1388245717300196
[15] Matas C.G., Matas S.L., Oliveira C.R., et al. Auditory evoked potentials and multiple sclerosis. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr., 2010, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 528–534. DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2010000400010. URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0004-282X2010000400010&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
[16] Ivancovic A., Nesek Madaric V., Starcevic Skoric M., et al. Auditory evoked potentials and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in evaluation of brainstem lesions in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci., 2013, vol. 328, no. 1-2, pp. 24–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.005 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X13000828
[17] Ramathan S., Lenton K., Burke T., et al. The utility of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis prognostication. J. Clin. Neurosci., 2013, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1576–1581. DOI: /10.1016/j.jocn.2013.01.020 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586813001914
[18] Ko K.F. The role of evoked potential and MR imaging in assessing multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Singapore Med. J., 2010, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 716–720.
[19] Valenzuela D.G., Kumar D.S., Atkins C.L., et al. Chloral hydrate sedation for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in children: safety and effectiveness. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., 2016, vol. 83, pp. 175–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.006 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165587616000653
[20] Bakhos D., Marx M., Villeneuve A., et al. Electrophysiological exploration of hearing. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis., 2017, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 325–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2017.02.011 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729617300509
[21] Baldwin M., Watkin P. Predicting the type of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening. Ear Hear., 2014, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e0718 URL: https://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/2014/01000/Predicting_the_Type_of_Hearing_Loss_Using_Click.1.aspx
[22] Shannon D.A., Felix J.K., Krumholz A., et al. Hearing screening of high-risk newborns with brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a follow-up study. Pediatrics, 1984, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 22–26.
[23] Levit Y., Himmelfarb M., Dollberg S. Sensitivity of the automated auditory brainstem response in neonatal hearing screening. Pediatrics, 2015, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 641–647. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3784 URL: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/136/3/e641
[24] Baranov A.A. Federal’nye klinicheskie rekomendatsii po okazaniyu meditsinskoy pomoshchi detyam s rasseyannym sklerozom [Federal clinical recommendations on healthcare delivery to children with multiple sclerosis]. Moscow, Soyuz pediatrov Rossii Publ., 2013 (in Russ.).
[25] Bryukhov V.V., Kulikova S.N., Krotenkova I.A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya [Medical Visualization], 2014, no. 2, pp. 10–21 (in Russ.).
[26] Likhachev S.A., Voytov V.V., Vashchilin V.V., et al. Multiple sclerosis: diagnostics and treatment. Nevrologiya i neyrokhirurgiya v Belarusi, 2009, no. 1(01), pp. 18–31 (in Russ.).
[27] Nakashima I., Fujihara K., Okita N., et al. Clinical and MRI study of brainstem and cerebellar involvement in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 1999, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 153–157. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.67.2.153 URL: https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/67/2/153
[28] Gnezditskiy V.V., Korepina O.S. Multimodal Evoked Potential (MEP) in Multiple sclerosis – EP criteria of demyelization: from diagnosis to patophysiology. Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v meditsine, biologii, farmakologii i ekologii. Mat. Mezhd. konf. [New informational technologies in medicine, biology, pharmakology and ecology. Proc. Int. Conf.]. Moscow, Institut novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy Publ., pp. 360–367 (in Russ.).
[29] Pashkov A.V., Polunina T.A., Kosacheva S.A. Description of brainstem auditory evoked responses (air and bone conduction) in children with normal hearing. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya [Pediatric Pharmacology], 2014, no. 4, pp. 93–96 (in Russ.).
[30] Il’chenko I.N., Pashkov A.V. Uniform system implementation of universal audiologic screening for babies in the first year of life in four Russian regions: monitoring of realization processes. Problemy upravleniya zdravookhraneniem, 2011, no. 1(56), pp. 41–45 (in Russ.).
[31] Haralampiev K. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in various tumors in the cerebellopontine angle. Vojnosanit. Pregl., 1990, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3–7.
[32] Moller M.B., Moller A.R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 1983, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 645–650. DOI: 10.1177/000348948309200622 URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000348948309200622
[33] Lui C., Zwang Y., Tang W., et al. Evoked potential changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav., 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, art. e00703. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.703 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/brb3.703
[34] Tachibana H., Takeda M., Sugita M. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with multi-infarct dementia and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int. J. Neurosci., 1989, vol. 48, no. 3-4, pp. 325–331. DOI: 10.3109/00207458909002179 URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00207458909002179
[35] Tachibana H., Takeda M., Okuda B., et al. Multimodal evoked potentials in Alzheimer’s disease and Binswanger’s disease. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol., 1996, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7–12. DOI: 10.1177/089198879600900102 URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/089198879600900102
[36] Pilecki V., Bolanowski M., Janocha A., et al. Assessment of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in patients with acromegaly. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett., 2008, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 373–378.
[37] Church M.W., Parent–Jenkins L., Rozzelle A.A., et al. Auditory brainstem response abnormalities and hearing loss in children with craniosynostosis. Pediatrics, 2007, vol. 119, no. 6, e1351–e1360.
[38] Thirumala P.D., Carnovale G., Loke Y., et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials’ diagnostic accuracy for hearing loss: systematic review and meta–analysis. J. Neurol. Surg. B, 2017, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 43–51. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584557 URL: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0036-1584557
[39] Sampath N., Subramaniam S., Sankaran V., et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J. Neuroanaesthesiol. Crit. Care, 2016, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–3. DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.174725 URL: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.4103/2348-0548.174725
[40] Aravabhumi S., Izzo K.L., Bakst B.L. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: intraoperative monitoring technique in surgery of posterior fossa tumors. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 1987, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 142–146.
[41] Sand T., Kvaloy M.B., Wader T., et al. Evoked potential tests in clinical diagnosis. Tidsskr. Nor Laegeforen, 2013, vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 960–965. DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.1176 URL: https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2013/05/evoked-potential-tests-clinical-diagnosis
[42] Jardim M., Person O.C., Rapoport P.B. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials as a method to assist the diagnosis of brain death. Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient., 2008, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 123–128. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-56872008000200009 URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-56872008000200009&lng=pt&tlng=pt